Teacher Preparation and Teacher Burnout
1. Teacher Burnout in the First Five Years
General Burnout and Attrition Rates
- High early-career attrition: A frequently cited statistic (often attributed to Ingersoll, the National Center for Education Statistics [NCES], and other studies) suggests that anywhere from 30% to 50% of new teachers leave the profession within their first five years.
- Context matters: Attrition rates can be higher in underserved schools, in subject areas with teacher shortages (like math and science), and in high-poverty areas.
Burnout Rates Among Math Teachers
- Math (and STEM) teacher turnover is often higher: Research by Ingersoll and May (2012) indicates that math and science teachers leave at higher rates than some other subject areas, partly due to increased demand for their content-area expertise in non-teaching professions.
- Estimates for math teachers: Although exact percentages can vary by district and region, some studies place math/science teacher turnover around 40%–45% in the first five years, aligning with or slightly exceeding the general teacher attrition average.
- Reasons for higher STEM attrition:
- Availability of private-sector jobs with competitive salaries
- Greater likelihood of being placed in hard-to-staff schools
- Lack of targeted professional development in STEM pedagogy
Key References
- Ingersoll, R. M., & May, H. (2012). The Magnitude, Destinations, and Determinants of Mathematics and Science Teacher Turnover. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(4), 435–464.
- National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Various reports on teacher attrition and mobility.
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The Flat World and Education: How America's Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future. Teachers College Press.
2. Major Change Agents in STEM and Years of Experience
Who Are the Change Agents?
- Experienced Teachers as Leaders: Research often shows that teacher-leaders (i.e., those who spearhead curricular or pedagogical innovation) tend to be mid-career or late-career educators with a strong classroom track record and established credibility among peers.
- New Teachers’ Enthusiasm and Fresh Ideas: Early-career teachers can bring energy and fresh pedagogical perspectives (especially from newly learned, cutting-edge research in STEM), making them natural change agents. However, lack of classroom management experience and limited institutional authority can pose challenges.
Feasibility of New Teachers Leading Change
Challenges for new teachers as change leaders:
- Credibility and trust: Colleagues often trust leaders who have navigated the local school culture and demonstrated classroom success.
- Emotional bandwidth: New teachers are typically juggling lesson planning, classroom management, and the steep learning curve of the first few years.
- Institutional barriers: Schools may have long-established norms resistant to change, especially if changes originate from someone with limited classroom experience in that specific context.
Support structures that help new teachers succeed as change agents:
- Mentorship programs and supportive administrators who value innovation
- Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) that encourage collaboration between new and veteran teachers
- Targeted professional development focused on leading STEM innovations
Key References
- Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the Sleeping Giant: Helping Teachers Develop as Leaders. Corwin Press.
- Sinha, S., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2017). Teacher Leadership in Science Education: Research, Impact, and Future Directions. Journal of Science Teacher Education.
3. Disconnection Between College Programs and Classroom Realities
The Preparation–Practice Divide
- Theory-heavy vs. practice-heavy: Many teacher-preparation programs focus on pedagogy, learning theory, and idealized “best practices.” New teachers often find a mismatch when confronted with real-world classroom constraints (e.g., large class sizes, limited resources, high-stakes testing).
- Rapidly evolving standards and policies: STEM fields and educational policies change quickly, so by the time new teachers enter the profession, what they learned in college may need adaptation.
- Insufficient clinical experience: While many programs include student teaching, some prospective teachers report insufficient exposure to diverse classroom settings or a lack of thorough feedback loops during their practicum.
Impact on Burnout
- Reality shock: The gap between the “ideal” portrayed in teacher education and the “reality” of classroom demands can lead to frustration, disillusionment, and higher burnout risk.
- Lack of tailored mentoring: New teachers may not receive specific, sustained mentoring in their first year (beyond minimal orientation), compounding the difficulties they encounter.
Possible Solutions
- Extended, high-quality clinical placements: Programs that offer year-long residencies or robust co-teaching experiences have been shown to reduce novice-teacher attrition.
- Stronger partnerships with local K–12 schools: Collaborative models ensure teacher candidates experience the realities of local contexts and build relationships before entering the profession.
- Ongoing support post-graduation: Universities that provide induction programs, online communities of practice, or coaching after graduation help bridge the preparation–practice gap.
4. Final Thoughts
- Acknowledge complexities: Creating educational change is challenging, especially when stakeholders have divergent views or when theory meets the complexity of real-world classrooms.
- Address burnout directly: Share statistics and personal stories to highlight why early-career teachers, particularly in math and STEM, might feel overwhelmed—and how support systems can mitigate this.
- Promote collaboration: Emphasize the importance of mentor-mentee relationships, peer support, and professional learning communities in fostering innovation and preventing isolation.
- Celebrate incremental wins: Change seldom happens overnight. Encourage small, consistent steps toward innovation rather than immediate large-scale transformation.
- Bridge the gap with academia: Encourage ongoing dialogue between K–12 educators and higher education faculty to align research-based practices with classroom pragmatics.
Quick Data Snapshot (U.S.)
- General teacher attrition in first 5 years: ~30–50%
- Math/Science teacher attrition in first 5 years: ~40–45% (slightly higher than general teacher attrition in some studies)
- Primary burnout factors: Workload, lack of administrative support, classroom management challenges, mismatch between training and classroom realities.
Select Bibliography
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The Flat World and Education: How America’s Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future. Teachers College Press.
- Ingersoll, R. M., & May, H. (2012). The Magnitude, Destinations, and Determinants of Mathematics and Science Teacher Turnover. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(4), 435–464.
- Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the Sleeping Giant: Helping Teachers Develop as Leaders. Corwin Press.
- National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Various teacher attrition reports.
- Sinha, S., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2017). Teacher Leadership in Science Education: Research, Impact, and Future Directions. Journal of Science Teacher Education.

Comments
Post a Comment